Live — in production Data Protection Impact Assessments · Malaysia PDPA

Issue a DPIA the Commissioner would recognise — with every finding evidenced and every sign-off human.

Praxis DPIA runs the 2026 DPIA Guideline exactly as published — Screen → Describe → Evaluate → Identify → Consider → Assess — and ends in an issued, tamper-evident report. For the law firm running it for clients, the DPO running it across a group, and the clinic, store or hotel running it for itself.

One complete run free · company email, no card Built on the Guideline of 30 April 2026 Author can never approve their own assessment
6DEICA stages, in the published order
20,000 / 10,000statutory screening thresholds built in
3 × 3likelihood × impact across 20 named risks
SHA-256hash on every evidence file and log entry
The problem

A DPIA done on a template is a DPIA you cannot defend.

The GDPR template with the labels changed

Article 35 templates miss Malaysia's own triggers — 20,000 data subjects, 10,000 where sensitive or financial data is involved — and the Commissioner's DEICA sequence.

Self-approved and unreviewed

When the person who wrote the assessment also signs it, the record shows a formality, not a review. That is the first thing a regulator or opposing counsel will notice.

Evidence in a shared drive

Screenshots in a folder and a PDF exported from a document do not prove what was known, by whom, on which date — or that nothing has been changed since.

S ScreenD DescribeE EvaluateI IdentifyC ConsiderA Assess
What you get

An issued record you can stand behind.

Runs Malaysia's actual 2026 guideline

Not a GDPR-style template. The engine implements the Commissioner's DPIA Guideline — its screening thresholds, its qualitative factors and its six DEICA stages — as written.

Sign-off that is enforced, not assumed

Draft → in review → approved → issued, with separation of duties built in. The author role cannot complete approval. The record shows who reviewed what, and when.

Defensible, dispute-proof records

A hash-chained audit trail and immutable issued snapshots give DPOs and partners a record that can be verified after the fact — not reconstructed from email.

Risk tracked to closure

Every Medium or High risk carries an owner, a mitigation, a target date and a residual rating. Identified risk becomes managed risk — useful evidence when a regulator asks.

Cross-border scored, not guessed

Where a DPIA finds a transfer, the facts hand off to Praxis Frontier for an s.129 Transfer Impact Assessment, and the finding returns to the DPIA record.

Less duplicate documentation

Hashed evidence is catalogued and reused across assessments, so recurring processing activities are not re-documented from scratch each time.

How it works

Six stages. One audit trail.

The Guideline's own sequence, with the screening determination recorded and signed even when no DPIA turns out to be required.

01
Screen

Quantitative triggers, the qualitative factor checklist and automated decision-making. The determination is recorded and signed either way.

02
Describe

Nature of processing, data categories, subjects, recipients, sub-processors, retention, security measures and a data-flow map.

03
Evaluate

Legal basis, consent validity, disclosure, cross-border (s.129 — opens a TIA in Praxis Frontier), necessity, proportionality, automated decisions.

04
Identify

A 3×3 likelihood × impact matrix across ten principle risks, ten standard harm risks and any custom risks you add.

05
Consider

Mitigation is mandatory for every Medium or High risk — owner, degree, target date and residual rating, tracked to closure.

06
Assess, approve, issue

Overall residual risk, reporting, reassessment triggers and validity — then review, approval and executive and appendix PDFs rendered from a locked snapshot.

What is inside

Everything an accountable assessment needs.

Two-tier statutory screening

Quantitative triggers plus the Guideline's qualitative checklist and the automated-decision rule — the decision not to proceed is documented too.

3×3 risk matrix

Likelihood × impact across ten principle risks, ten standard harm risks and your own custom risks, with mandatory mitigation for Medium and High.

Built-in transfer scoring

Cross-border adequacy scored per destination inside the DPIA, with a documented handoff to Praxis Frontier for the full s.129 assessment.

Enforced separation of duties

Draft → in review → approved → issued. The author role cannot approve. Typically a partner in a firm, the DPO in an enterprise.

Evidence annex

Every supporting document SHA-256 hashed on upload, with a verification lifecycle and a reuse catalogue across assessments.

Versioning that never overwrites

Approved snapshots are immutable; revisions supersede. Reassessment triggers — new purpose, data, transfer, technology, processor, incident or legal change — reopen the record.

Reports from a locked snapshot

Executive and appendix PDFs rendered server-side from the issued version, so the document and the record can never disagree.

Enterprise access control

Owner, admin, DPO, contributor and viewer roles enforced per route; two-factor authentication; per-organisation SSO via OIDC (Azure AD / Entra, Google, Okta).

Hash-chained audit log

Append-only, with a chain-verification endpoint anyone with the right role can call to confirm nothing has been altered.

Built to be defended

Every claim on the report is traceable to a record.

Separation of duties
An author cannot approve their own DPIA. Approval is a distinct role enforced by the system — not a checkbox.
Evidence
SHA-256 hashed on upload, carrying a verification status, attached to the finding it substantiates and reusable from a catalogue.
Audit log
Append-only and hash-chained, with a verification endpoint. The chain shows every state change and who made it.
Versions
Issued snapshots are immutable. A revision supersedes rather than replaces, and the chain shows both.
Tenancy
Multi-tenant organisations with role-based access; users can belong to and switch between organisations. A law firm's clients, or a group's entities, stay segregated.
Praxis Integrity
Every issued report is listed for life in the suite's public verification registry as it ships — a counterparty can confirm the report is genuine and current without seeing its contents.

Who runs it

Law firms

Run DPIAs for many clients from one firm account, each in its own segregated workspace, with partner approval enforced and evidence reused across a client's recurring activities.

Enterprise DPOs

One register across entities and business units, with SSO, role-based access, DPO approval and board-ready PDFs — and a verifiable audit chain when the Commissioner asks.

Clinics, e-commerce, hotels & rentals

Start with the free “Do I need a DPIA?” screening. If a DPIA is required, the guided workflow ends in a real, signed record you can produce when a regulator, insurer or enterprise customer asks.

How to get it

Start free. Pay only for what you issue.

Every new organisation gets one complete end-to-end DPIA free — the full workflow and the clean, submission-ready report for one client. After that, buy one at a time or take a suite plan. All prices in MYR, exclusive of applicable tax.

Free first run
RM0one complete DPIA

The full workflow and the issued report for one client. Company email required; no card needed. The workspace locks after issuance until you buy or subscribe.

Start free
Pay per assessment
RM950one DPIA · 30-day window

One clean issued report, listed in Praxis Integrity. One free 30-day extension on request. Credited against your first subscription if you subscribe within 90 days.

Buy one DPIA
Suite plan
from RM599per month · 3 client workspaces

Praxis DPIA plus every other Praxis application, licensed by active client matter. Unlimited users, unlimited archiving, slots free on archive.

Compare suite plans
Common questions

Before you commit.

The Malaysian one. The engine implements the Personal Data Protection Commissioner's DPIA Guideline of 30 April 2026 — its DEICA sequence, its 20,000 / 10,000 data-subject triggers and its qualitative factor checklist — rather than an Article 35 template relabelled for Malaysia.

One complete DPIA end to end: screening, all six DEICA stages, review, approval and the issued executive and appendix PDFs for one client. After that first issuance the workspace becomes read-only until you buy an assessment or subscribe. Nothing is deleted.

Someone other than the person who prepared it. Praxis DPIA enforces separation of duties at the system level: the author role cannot complete the approval step. Typically a partner in a law firm, or the DPO in an enterprise.

Reassessment triggers — a new purpose, data category, transfer, technology, processor, an incident or a legal change — reopen the record. The original issued snapshot stays immutable; the revision supersedes it and the chain shows both.

Yes. Users are never metered. Once your organisation subscribes, colleagues join by invitation from your administrator with a role — owner, admin, DPO, contributor or viewer — enforced per route.

No. Praxis DPIA structures and evidences professional analysis. Outputs require review and approval by an appropriately qualified person before reliance or issue.

Praxis DPIA structures and evidences professional analysis. It does not provide legal advice, and it does not replace the review and approval of an appropriately qualified person before reliance or issue.

PDPA Act 709 (Act A1727 amendments)PDPA DPIA Guideline (30 April 2026) · DEICAADMP Guideline
Part of the Praxis suite

One subscription. Every application.

Every suite plan includes all seven applications as each ships — licensed by client workspace, never by seat. See plans.

The full workflow and the issued report for one client — on a scenario you recognise.

Run your first DPIA free.

Praxis DPIAStart free — one full DPIA